From: FRice@SkepticTank.ORG (Rev. Fredric L. Rice)
JPilkonis1 wrote:
Posted to a.r.s and e-mailed.
> Well, guys, this afternoon, we got two Narconon-related visits
...cuts...flr...
So they continued to lie through their teeth like a bunch of
organized crime racketeering crooks -- my opinion only. What
a surprise. They're supposed to practice what they call
"TR-L" -- "Training Routine Lie" -- which
is supposed to -- in Hubbard's words -- "outflow false
data convincingly." In other words, to use Scientology's
terms, they "didn't have their TRs in" and their lies
were blatantly obvious.
Did they ever get back to you with the "recanting" of
C. Everett Koop's comments about Narconon on the
http://www.Crackpots.ORG/ web site?
Also it was reported that the crooks in Oklahoma -- my opinion only --
are allegedly telling callers that my web site -- Crackpots.ORG -- is
run by a drug manufacturing company that manufactures methadone.
Presumably they're telling callers that so they they'll think they can
ignore the undeniable evidence accumulated on that web site.
And it's amusing to observe these crooks -- my opinion only -- seem to
think that the press in your township are the blame when in fact the
whole damn township ramped up and twigged to the scam pretty much on
their own and it was your paper that started digging, did the research,
and simply reported the facts -- and every damn fact that was reported
by your paper are backed by a mountain of evidence. I don't think I
recall a single unsupported opinion.
<heh> See, they have to find the "SP" which kept
them from sneaking into town by putting one over on the local rubes.
They can't conceive of the notion that lots of people in town have
Internet access and got the dope -- pun intended -- on the Narconon
scam. No, accoring to Hubbard policy there's a "SP" that
has to be uncovered to account for the embarrassing exposures and
the idiots seem to think it's the Carroll Star News since they
covered the news.
JP, I hope these idiots never twigg to the fact that the Internet
undoes them.
Sue Horn, our editor, asked whether they were hourly or
<laughing> TRs are out.
>I asked what body Thetans were, as per Rev. Fred's advice.
So they claimed to not even know what Scientology is all about. How
amusing. Presumably they're willing to blatantly lie to the citizens
of Bowdon and to the press for Scientology which means that they've
been in long enough to subject themselves to brainwashing which would
remove any ethics or morals they started out with. They should have
been in long enough to know about Xenu, Body Thetans, OT3, the flying
saucers et al.
And yet they claim to know nothing about Scientology's core
"beliefs."
Bart Cater, a member of the Board of Education who just
They'll FAX that to you. }:-} And you know the CBC claim turned
out to be an outright blatant lie, too. You should report on that
lie as well.
But the coup de grace came from our publisher, the
<smile> Georgia boys, don't fuck with.
That's funny because Thursday at 2:00 p.m. is also _their_ deadline
for their "stats" reports each cult office has to file
with their head ringleaders.
Sorry this is so long, but I figured you guys would
They're going to wait until after the McPherson murder civil trial
has either been settled out of court or has been in session for 10
days. I wonder if that means they're waiting until their shyster
lawyers -- my opinion only -- are free to sue the living fuck out
of Bowdon/Carrollton and the State of Georgia by claiming religious
discrimination while at the same time stamping their little feet
and demanding that Narconon some how isn't Scientology.
>I'll keep you guys posted as further developments happen.
Thanks, JP. Always good to hear news from the trenches.
>J. Pilkonis
The name "Narconon"® is trademarked to the Scientology
organization through one of their many front groups. The name
"Scientology"® is also trademarked to the "Church"
of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the
individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the
dangers of the Narconon scam are members of or representitives of the
Scientology organization.
If you or a loved one needs help -- real help -- there are
a number of rehabilitation programs you can contact. The real
Narcotics Anonymous organization
can get you in touch with real people who can help you.
Click [HERE] to visit Narcotivs
Anonymous's web site. Narcotics Anonymous's telephone number is
1 (818) 773-9999.
Return to The NarCONon exposure's main Index page.
Forward: For a systematic, detailed, professional exposure of
Scientology's "Narconon" front group, visit the
Narconon Exposed web site.
To: jpilkonis1@aol.com, occr@skeptictank.org
Subject: A surprise visit from the Narco-weenies...
Date: 02 May 2002
> at the office. The first was a man who was the father of one
> of the program's "success" stories, who related the tale of
> how her daughter, a drug addict since junior high, was "saved"
> through the program.
> salaried employees. After visibly hesitating, one said, "I'm
> a volunteer..." and the other, picking up on what he was
> "supposed" to say, eventually said the same thing.
>They both played dumb. (They weren't really good at it.)
> happened to be hanging around the office, took them to
> task about their claims (at the zoning meeting) of having
> a working relationship with the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts
> in Bowdon. Not only had the Scouts denied such a
> relationship, they had mentioned that Bart was not the
> first person to pose such a question. When confronted
> with this, once more, our visitors played dumb, and
> promised to "look into it" for us.
> fearless Bill Chappell. Towards the end of the meeting,
> Bill said, "We've heard a lot of rumors about you.
> I don't know which are true and which are not. But
> remember that if you come after JP, you're coming
> after me, too, and if you're coming after me... well,
> welcome to Carroll County, boys...." Reverse
> intimidation to say the least.
> Bill cut the meeting short because Thursday is
> our deadline day, but invited >them back next Tuesday.
> I wonder whether they'll be back at all.
> appreciate a detailed report. And by the way, we got
> copies of the official paperwork that says they'll
> be presenting a new re-zoning application not at the
> May meeting but in June. They also bring their case
> before the county commission in July. (The commission
> has a reputation for overturning zoning board
> recommendations, so it's a wild card for them.)
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of
the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may
not be those of the Chairman of Skeptic Tank.